The Unseen Victims

How Removing an Invasive Plant Could Harm Forest Salamanders

Article Navigation

Introduction
The Invader's Reign
Salamanders: Hidden Regulators
The Critical Experiment
Management Crossroads
Scientist's Toolkit
Conclusion

Introduction: An Ecosystem Paradox

Deep within the deciduous forests of eastern North America, a quiet drama unfolds between an aggressive invader, a tiny amphibian, and the scientists trying to restore balance. Garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolata), introduced from Europe in the 1800s as a culinary and medicinal herb, has become one of the continent's most destructive forest invaders ¹ ³ . Meanwhile, the eastern red-backed salamander (Plethodon cinereus), a lungless amphibian barely longer than your finger, serves as the most abundant vertebrate predator in these ecosystems, with biomass exceeding that of birds and small mammals combined ⁶ . When land managers remove the invasive plant to rescue native flora, they may unintentionally harm these ecologically vital salamanders—revealing the complex web of forest connections that challenges simple conservation solutions.

The Invader's Stealthy Reign

Garlic mustard's silent takeover begins with astonishing reproductive efficiency. A single plant can produce up to 7,900 seeds that remain viable for 5-7 years, forming extensive seed banks that ensure persistent invasion ¹ ³ . Unlike most invasives, it thrives in shaded understories, forming dense monocultures that outcompete native wildflowers like trilliums and trout lilies through multiple weapons:

Allelochemical warfare: Releases sinigrin that disrupts mycorrhizal networks essential for 80% of forest plants ¹ ³
Seasonal advantage: Emerges earlier in spring than natives, capturing light and resources first ³ ⁵
Deer resistance: Avoided by herbivores that consume native alternatives ³

Table 1: Garlic Mustard's Invasion Toolkit

Trait	Impact	Scale
Seed production	600-7,900 seeds/plant	Creates persistent seed banks (5-7 yr viability) ¹
Allelopathy	Releases sinigrin into soil	Disrupts mycorrhizal networks of native plants ¹ ³
Phenological advantage	Emerges earlier in spring	Blocks light/moisture for later-emerging natives ⁵
Chemical defense	Cyanide in mature leaves	Deters herbivory (except specialist insects) ³ ⁵

Salamanders: The Hidden Regulators

Red-backed salamanders, though inconspicuous, serve as ecological linchpins in these forests. As sit-and-wait predators, they consume invertebrates that influence decomposition and nutrient cycling. Their moist, permeable skin makes them exceptionally sensitive to microhabitat changes—essentially functioning as living environmental sensors ⁶ . Studies suggest they may influence:

Decomposition

By preying on leaf-fragmenting insects and fungivorous collembolans ⁶

Nutrient dynamics

Through excretion that fertilizes soils ⁶

Food webs

As prey for snakes, birds, and larger amphibians

Did You Know?

Red-backed salamanders have a biomass greater than all birds and small mammals combined in their forest habitats, making them the dominant vertebrate predators in these ecosystems ⁶ .

The Critical Experiment: Removal Fallout

A landmark 3-year field study led by Lehtinen revealed the unexpected costs of invasive plant removal ⁷ ⁹ . Researchers established paired plots across multiple forests—some with invasive plants removed, others left undisturbed. Salamander populations were monitored using cover board surveys, while soil parameters were tracked.

Methodology: Tracking the Unseen

Site selection: Three forest sites with varying invasion intensity
Treatment design: Eight 314-m² removal plots paired with undisturbed controls
Salamander monitoring: Cover boards checked repeatedly during spring/fall (2016-2018; 2,187 surveys)
Soil analysis: Temperature, moisture, litter depth beneath boards
Lab validation: Salamander responses to native vs. invasive root extracts ⁹

Table 2: Salamander Occupancy After Invasive Plant Removal

Site Invasion Intensity	Undisturbed Plots	Removal Plots	Change
Low	62% occupancy	58% occupancy	-4%
Moderate	59%	42%	-17%
High	55%	29%	-26% ⁷ ⁹

The Counterintuitive Results

Salamander occupancy dropped most dramatically (26%) in heavily invaded sites after invasive removal—precisely where managers prioritize action ⁷ ⁹ . Soil analysis revealed that removal plots had:

Higher soil moisture

Loss of plant cover increased evaporation

Reduced litter complexity

Fewer roots and decaying matter

Microclimate instability

Wider temperature fluctuations

Lab tests confirmed salamanders showed no avoidance of garlic mustard root chemicals compared to native plants, suggesting they aren't directly harmed by the invader ⁹ . Instead, the physical disturbance of removal destabilizes their microhabitat.

Management Crossroads: Balancing Solutions

Traditional Approaches & Limitations

Manual pulling: Effective for small infestations but must remove upper root half; requires 5-7 years to deplete seed bank ¹ ⁵
Herbicides: Glyphosate applied in early spring targets garlic mustard with minimal non-target damage; restricted near water ¹ ⁵
Prevention: Minimizing forest floor disturbance to reduce establishment ¹

Emerging Sustainable Strategies

Biocontrol breakthroughs

After 25 years of testing, two host-specific European weevils (Ceutorhynchus scrobicollis and C. constrictus) now show promise. C. constrictus reduces seed production by 60%, while C. scrobicollis damages 100% of plants in some sites ² ⁴ ⁸ . Approved in Canada (2025) and pending U.S. approval, they offer long-term suppression with minimal non-target risk ⁸ .

Edible eradication

Foraging initiatives promote garlic mustard consumption. Young leaves make nutritious pesto, while roots substitute horseradish (caution: mature plants contain cyanide and require cooking) ³ ⁵

Table 3: Comparing Garlic Mustard Control Strategies

Method	Efficacy	Cost	Salamander Impact
Manual removal	High in small areas	Moderate labor	High negative impact (soil disturbance)
Herbicide	High in large stands	Low material cost	Minimal if applied selectively
Biocontrol weevils	Long-term suppression	High initial R&D	Likely neutral/positive
"Eat the Invader"	Community engagement	Low	Neutral if done carefully

The Scientist's Toolkit: Decoding Forest Dynamics

Essential Tools for Soil-Wildlife Research

Cover boards

Pre-cut wood (e.g., 1×0.25×0.02m hemlock) placed on soil. Salamanders shelter underneath, enabling non-invasive monitoring ⁹

Soil corers

Cylindrical tools extract intact soil profiles for bulk density and moisture analysis

Leaf litter grids

1-m² frames quantify litter depth/composition

Root extract solutions

Lab-prepared extracts test plant chemical effects on salamanders ⁹

iMapInvasives database

Tracks invasive distributions for targeted management ¹

Conclusion: Rethinking Restoration

The garlic mustard saga reveals a profound ecological truth: simplistic "remove the invader" approaches often ignore intricate species interdependencies. While this plant undoubtedly harms forest health, its removal without restoring native understory creates microclimates too unstable for red-backed salamanders. Effective management now integrates:

Precision biocontrol using specialist weevils
Disturbance-minimizing removal timed with native plant restoration
Continuous monitoring of indicator species like salamanders

As Lehtinen's research implies ⁷ ⁹ , conservation success requires asking not just how to remove invaders, but how to rebuild functioning ecosystems—soil, salamanders, and all.