Transforming how we teach biology to prepare educators for a sustainable future
In an era defined by unprecedented global challenges—from climate change to biodiversity loss—the role of education has never been more critical. The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) represent an urgent call to action, recognizing that education is the key to building a more sustainable world. Target 4.7 of the SDGs explicitly emphasizes that by 2030, we must "ensure that all learners acquire the knowledge and skills needed to promote sustainable development" 1 .
Within this educational landscape, biological education holds unique potential. As we strive to protect ecosystems, ensure food security, and combat diseases, the biological sciences provide essential knowledge and methodologies for understanding and addressing these complex challenges. This article explores how pedagogical universities are fundamentalizing biological education to prepare educators who can effectively teach the next generation to live sustainably and make informed decisions for our planet's future.
Education for Sustainable Development (ESD), as defined by UNESCO, equips people with the knowledge, capacities, values, attitudes, and behaviors necessary to live in respectful interaction with our environment, economy, and society 6 . It empowers individuals to make intelligent and responsible decisions that help create a better future for all.
ESD transcends traditional environmental education by incorporating social, cultural, and economic dimensions of sustainability, encouraging holistic thinking about interconnected systems.
Biological sciences occupy a central position in the sustainability discourse. Many core biological concepts—from ecology and genetics to microbiology and physiology—provide critical context for understanding global challenges and their potential solutions 1 .
Areas such as immunology, medicine, ecology, genetics, horticulture, and agriculture offer vital frameworks for considering sustainable development issues. As noted by researchers studying science education programs, biology provides "an important context and basis for considering development issues" and offers "the potential to explore both social and scientific perspectives relating to key global challenges of our time" 1 .
Traditional science education often emphasizes technical knowledge transmission. However, contemporary approaches in pedagogical universities are shifting toward developing critical scientific literacy that enables students to meaningfully navigate multiple perspectives presented in media and public debates about sustainability issues 1 .
This expanded view of scientific literacy encompasses three essential dimensions:
Hands-on experimental work plays a crucial role in fundamentalizing biological education. As research on experimental spaces in biology education has found, practical activities including field trips and laboratory work are essential for developing skills in thinking, observation, analysis, integration, organization, creativity, decision-making, problem-solving, reflection, and evaluation 2 .
| Skill Category | Specific Skills | Relevance to Sustainability Education |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive Skills | Critical thinking, analysis, integration, organization | Enables systems thinking about complex sustainability challenges |
| Scientific Practices | Hypothesis formulation, experimental design, data interpretation | Develops capacity for evidence-based decision making |
| Social-Emotional Skills | Creativity, reflection, evaluation | Fosters adaptability and ethical reasoning |
| Civic Skills | Decision-making, problem-solving | Prepares for community engagement with sustainability issues |
An innovative model emerging in science teacher education braids the principle of "Two-Eyed Seeing" with Education for Sustainable Development through the One Health Teaching Clinic framework 5 .
This approach recognizes the interconnectedness of human, animal, and environmental health—a core concern of sustainability. The Two-Eyed Seeing framework honors the strengths of both Indigenous and Western knowledge systems, allowing pre-service teachers to engage with One Health topics in a way that respects diverse ways of knowing 5 .
The One Health framework in biological education emphasizes that the health of humans, animals, and ecosystems is interconnected. This perspective has profound implications for how we approach sustainability challenges such as:
| Human Health Aspect | Animal Health Connection | Environmental Health Dimension |
|---|---|---|
| Infectious diseases | Zoonotic disease reservoirs | Ecosystem changes affecting disease transmission |
| Nutritional health | Livestock and fisheries management | Agricultural sustainability and soil health |
| Mental wellbeing | Human-animal bond | Access to green spaces and natural environments |
| Respiratory health | Air quality effects on wildlife | Atmospheric pollution and climate change |
While numerous biological experiments could illustrate the process of scientific discovery, few are as foundational to understanding sustainability as Charles Darwin's observations of finches in the Galápagos Islands 7 . This classic "experiment of nature" provides crucial insights into how species adapt to their environments—a fundamental concept for predicting how organisms might respond to environmental changes driven by human activity.
Darwin's approach, while not a controlled experiment in the modern laboratory sense, exemplifies rigorous observational science:
During the voyage of the HMS Beagle (1831-1836), Darwin collected numerous finch specimens from different islands in the Galápagos archipelago.
He carefully documented variations in beak shape, size, and structure among the finches.
He noted correlations between beak characteristics and available food sources on different islands.
After returning to England, Darwin worked with ornithologist John Gould to systematically classify the finches and recognize they represented different species.
He observed that finches on islands with different ecological conditions had developed distinct beak adaptations.
The significance of Darwin's finch observations extends far beyond establishing evolutionary theory:
| Research Finding | Time Period | Significance for Sustainability |
|---|---|---|
| Correlation between beak morphology and diet | 1830s (Darwin) to present | Demonstrates adaptation to available resources |
| Rapid evolutionary changes in finches in response to drought | 1970s-present (Peter and Rosemary Grant) | Shows real-time adaptation to environmental stress |
| Genetic basis for beak variation identified | 2000s | Reveals molecular mechanisms of evolutionary change |
| Climate change effects on finch populations | Ongoing | Informs conservation strategies for changing ecosystems |
Both in research laboratories and educational settings, certain fundamental materials and reagents enable the study of biological phenomena. The table below outlines essential components of a biologist's toolkit, with applications ranging from basic education to advanced research.
| Reagent/Material | Primary Function | Educational Applications |
|---|---|---|
| DNA extraction solutions | Isolate genetic material from cells | Study genetic variation, biodiversity assessment, evolutionary relationships |
| Bacterial culture media | Grow microorganisms under controlled conditions | Investigate microbiology, antibiotic resistance, ecosystem services of microbes |
| pH indicators and buffers | Measure and maintain acidity/alkalinity | Study enzyme activity, environmental monitoring, ocean acidification experiments |
| Microscopy stains and dyes | Enhance visualization of cellular structures | Explore cell biology, histology, disease diagnosis |
| Plant growth regulators | Influence plant development and responses | Investigate plant physiology, agricultural applications, environmental stress responses |
| Field collection equipment | Sample organisms from natural habitats | Conduct biodiversity surveys, ecological monitoring, population studies |
The fundamentalization of biological education in pedagogical universities represents a critical investment in our collective future. By moving beyond mere knowledge transmission to foster critical scientific literacy, embracing experiential learning through laboratory and field work, and adopting integrative approaches like the One Health framework, we prepare biology educators who can inspire the next generation to address our most pressing sustainability challenges.
Developing teachers who can effectively communicate biological concepts in the context of sustainability.
Integrating knowledge systems and perspectives for comprehensive understanding.
Equipping students with the knowledge and skills needed for a sustainable world.
As we navigate the complexities of the 21st century, the biological sciences offer essential insights into creating a more sustainable relationship with our planet. Through innovative teacher education programs that emphasize both deep biological knowledge and its application to real-world problems, we create ripple effects that will extend far beyond the classroom. The future of sustainable development depends on educators who can not only explain biological concepts but also foster the values, skills, and perspectives needed to build a thriving world for all living systems.
As researchers studying science teacher education have argued, pre-service teachers must be supported "to explore the links between science and society using discursive pedagogical approaches with a view to developing critical scientific literacy for sustainable development" 1 . This mission lies at the heart of fundamentalizing biological education in pedagogical universities—a mission that has never been more urgent or important.