How Scientists Discovered the First Microtubules
Imagine microscopic scaffolding that shapes your cells, transports vital cargo, and pulls chromosomes apart during cell division—all while dynamically assembling and disassembling at lightning speed. This is the world of microtubules, the unsung architects of cellular life. Their discovery revolutionized cell biology, revealing how life maintains its intricate internal order.
Microtubules in a cell (SEM image)
Microtubules are hollow, tubular polymers of the protein tubulin, essential for cell division, intracellular transport, and maintaining cellular structure. But until the 1950s, they were invisible to science. Early electron microscopists glimpsed filamentous structures but dismissed them as artifacts of poor fixation. The breakthrough came in 1963 with glutaraldehyde fixation, which preserved these delicate structures for electron microscopy. Researchers Ledbetter and Porter coined the term "microtubules" after observing them in plant cells, describing "long, hollow tubes of 250 Å diameter" 3 5 .
Early electron microscopy reveals filamentous structures in cells, but they're dismissed as artifacts.
Ledbetter and Porter observe microtubules in plant cells using glutaraldehyde fixation.
Borisy and Taylor identify tubulin as the colchicine-binding protein.
Hideo Mohri names the protein "tubulin".
Meanwhile, biochemists were chasing a different lead. Colchicine, a plant-derived compound, paralyzed cell division, but its target was unknown. Gary Borisy and Ed Taylor at the University of Chicago used tritium-labeled colchicine as a molecular "hook" to fish out its binding partner. Their experiments revealed a protein concentrated in brain tissue and sea urchin sperm, which they identified as the building block of microtubules. In 1968, Hideo Mohri named this protein tubulin 1 3 .
Microtubules are polymers of α- and β-tubulin dimers. These subunits stack head-to-tail into protofilaments, with 13 filaments forming a hollow tube 25 nm in diameter. Crucially, the structure has polarity: the "minus end" anchors near the cell center, while the rapidly growing "plus end" extends outward. This polarity acts as a one-way street for molecular motors like kinesin and dynein, which haul cargo along the microtubule 3 4 .
13 protofilaments form a hollow tube with distinct plus and minus ends.
Kinesin and dynein motor proteins transport cargo along microtubules.
In 1984, Tim Mitchison and Marc Kirschner cracked the code of microtubule behavior. Unlike stable polymers, microtubules undergo dynamic instability—randomly switching between growth and catastrophic shrinkage. This stems from GTP hydrolysis: tubulin dimers add to the plus end in a GTP-bound state, forming a protective "cap." If hydrolysis outpaces growth, the cap is lost, triggering depolymerization. This stochastic assembly allows microtubules to rapidly remodel during cell division or migration 3 7 .
Borisy and Taylor's 1967 experiment was a masterclass in creative biochemistry 1 3 :
Results showed high colchicine uptake in all tissues, but brain tissue had 10× higher binding. This confirmed a ubiquitous protein target—tubulin. Crucially, colchicine binding inhibited microtubule assembly, explaining its antimitotic effect.
"This work proved tubulin was conserved across species and laid groundwork for cancer drugs like taxol, which stabilizes microtubules."
For decades, microtubules were considered exclusively eukaryotic. That dogma shattered in 2011 when Grant Jensen and Martin Pilhofer imaged Prosthecobacter bacteria using cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM). These bacteria contained filaments strikingly similar to microtubules, assembled from proteins BtubA and BtubB 6 .
| Reagent | Function | Experimental Use |
|---|---|---|
| Colchicine | Binds tubulin, prevents polymerization | Inhibiting mitosis; tracking tubulin |
| Taxol/Paclitaxel | Stabilizes microtubules | Studying fixed structures; cancer therapy |
| Glutaraldehyde | Crosslinks and fixes microtubules | Sample preservation for EM |
| Fluorescent Tubulin | Labels microtubules in live cells | Visualizing dynamics via microscopy |
| GTPγS | Non-hydrolyzable GTP analog | Trapping microtubules in growing state |
Recent cryo-EM advances now resolve microtubules at atomic resolution (~3.5 Å), revealing how drugs like taxol bind β-tubulin pockets 3 7 . These insights are driving therapies for:
"The first tubulin structure gave us a framework, but now we're watching microtubules breathe and flex in real time."
The next frontier? Engineering synthetic microtubules for nanomedicine—proving the smallest cellular machines hold the biggest promises.
Microtubules with bound drug molecules (SEM image)
Explore the seminal papers by Borisy & Taylor (1967) and Jensen et al. (2011), or visit the NIH's 3D tubulin database.