The Cellular Highways

How Scientists Discovered the First Microtubules

Imagine microscopic scaffolding that shapes your cells, transports vital cargo, and pulls chromosomes apart during cell division—all while dynamically assembling and disassembling at lightning speed. This is the world of microtubules, the unsung architects of cellular life. Their discovery revolutionized cell biology, revealing how life maintains its intricate internal order.

Microtubules in a cell

Microtubules in a cell (SEM image)

The Dawn of the Microtubule Era

Microtubules are hollow, tubular polymers of the protein tubulin, essential for cell division, intracellular transport, and maintaining cellular structure. But until the 1950s, they were invisible to science. Early electron microscopists glimpsed filamentous structures but dismissed them as artifacts of poor fixation. The breakthrough came in 1963 with glutaraldehyde fixation, which preserved these delicate structures for electron microscopy. Researchers Ledbetter and Porter coined the term "microtubules" after observing them in plant cells, describing "long, hollow tubes of 250 Å diameter" 3 5 .

1950s

Early electron microscopy reveals filamentous structures in cells, but they're dismissed as artifacts.

1963

Ledbetter and Porter observe microtubules in plant cells using glutaraldehyde fixation.

1967

Borisy and Taylor identify tubulin as the colchicine-binding protein.

1968

Hideo Mohri names the protein "tubulin".

Meanwhile, biochemists were chasing a different lead. Colchicine, a plant-derived compound, paralyzed cell division, but its target was unknown. Gary Borisy and Ed Taylor at the University of Chicago used tritium-labeled colchicine as a molecular "hook" to fish out its binding partner. Their experiments revealed a protein concentrated in brain tissue and sea urchin sperm, which they identified as the building block of microtubules. In 1968, Hideo Mohri named this protein tubulin 1 3 .

Blueprint of a Cellular Machine

Molecular Architecture

Microtubules are polymers of α- and β-tubulin dimers. These subunits stack head-to-tail into protofilaments, with 13 filaments forming a hollow tube 25 nm in diameter. Crucially, the structure has polarity: the "minus end" anchors near the cell center, while the rapidly growing "plus end" extends outward. This polarity acts as a one-way street for molecular motors like kinesin and dynein, which haul cargo along the microtubule 3 4 .

Microtubule Structure
Microtubule structure

13 protofilaments form a hollow tube with distinct plus and minus ends.

Molecular Motors
Microtubule and motor proteins

Kinesin and dynein motor proteins transport cargo along microtubules.

Dynamic Instability: The Pulse of Cellular Life

In 1984, Tim Mitchison and Marc Kirschner cracked the code of microtubule behavior. Unlike stable polymers, microtubules undergo dynamic instability—randomly switching between growth and catastrophic shrinkage. This stems from GTP hydrolysis: tubulin dimers add to the plus end in a GTP-bound state, forming a protective "cap." If hydrolysis outpaces growth, the cap is lost, triggering depolymerization. This stochastic assembly allows microtubules to rapidly remodel during cell division or migration 3 7 .

Key Structural Features of Microtubules
Characteristic Eukaryotic Microtubules Bacterial Microtubules
Protofilament Number 13 5
Diameter 25 nm ~23 nm
Tubulin Subunits α- and β-tubulin BtubA and BtubB
GTP Hydrolysis Yes (drives dynamics) Minimal
Nucleation Site Centrosome/Golgi Unknown

Data derived from structural studies 3 4 6

The Experiment That Changed Everything: Hunting the Colchicine-Binding Protein

Methodology: A Radioactive Trail

Borisy and Taylor's 1967 experiment was a masterclass in creative biochemistry 1 3 :

  1. Radiolabeling: Tritiated colchicine (³H-colchicine) was synthesized to track binding.
  2. Tissue Sampling: Brain homogenate (rich in microtubules), sea urchin eggs, and HeLa cells were incubated with ³H-colchicine.
  3. Centrifugation: Samples were spun at 100,000 × g to pellet colchicine-bound complexes.
  4. Radioactivity Measurement: Pellet radioactivity quantified colchicine-binding activity.
Colchicine Binding Across Tissues

Data adapted from Borisy & Taylor (1967) 1 3

The Eureka Moment

Results showed high colchicine uptake in all tissues, but brain tissue had 10× higher binding. This confirmed a ubiquitous protein target—tubulin. Crucially, colchicine binding inhibited microtubule assembly, explaining its antimitotic effect.

"This work proved tubulin was conserved across species and laid groundwork for cancer drugs like taxol, which stabilizes microtubules."

Bacterial Ancestors: Rewriting the History of Microtubules

For decades, microtubules were considered exclusively eukaryotic. That dogma shattered in 2011 when Grant Jensen and Martin Pilhofer imaged Prosthecobacter bacteria using cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM). These bacteria contained filaments strikingly similar to microtubules, assembled from proteins BtubA and BtubB 6 .

The Cryo-EM Breakthrough
  • Sample Preparation: Bacterial cells were flash-frozen to preserve native structure.
  • Imaging: Cryo-EM generated 3D reconstructions at ~4 Å resolution.
  • Key Finding: Bacterial "microtubules" had 5 protofilaments (vs. 13 in eukaryotes) but similar lateral interactions. Crucially, BtubA/BtubB shared sequence homology with eukaryotic tubulin 6 .
Bacterial microtubules
Tubulin Gene Evolution and Functions
Tubulin Type Organisms Function Role in Disease
α/β-Tubulin Eukaryotes Mitosis, transport Cancer, neuropathies
BtubA/BtubB Prosthecobacter Unknown (plasmid segregation?) None known
γ-Tubulin Eukaryotes Microtubule nucleation Microcephaly, cancer

Evolutionary insights from cryo-EM studies 3 6

The implication: Microtubules predate eukaryotes! Bacterial versions likely evolved for plasmid segregation, later co-opted for complex cellular tasks 6 .

The Scientist's Toolkit: Key Reagents in Microtubule Research

Essential Research Reagents for Microtubule Studies
Reagent Function Experimental Use
Colchicine Binds tubulin, prevents polymerization Inhibiting mitosis; tracking tubulin
Taxol/Paclitaxel Stabilizes microtubules Studying fixed structures; cancer therapy
Glutaraldehyde Crosslinks and fixes microtubules Sample preservation for EM
Fluorescent Tubulin Labels microtubules in live cells Visualizing dynamics via microscopy
GTPγS Non-hydrolyzable GTP analog Trapping microtubules in growing state

Reagents derived from historical and modern studies 1 3 7

The Future: From Atomic Structures to Smart Drugs

Recent cryo-EM advances now resolve microtubules at atomic resolution (~3.5 Å), revealing how drugs like taxol bind β-tubulin pockets 3 7 . These insights are driving therapies for:

  • Cancer: Drugs targeting microtubule dynamics (e.g., vinblastine) remain chemotherapy staples.
  • Neurodegeneration: Tau protein pathology in Alzheimer's involves microtubule destabilization 7 .

"The first tubulin structure gave us a framework, but now we're watching microtubules breathe and flex in real time."

Eva Nogales

The next frontier? Engineering synthetic microtubules for nanomedicine—proving the smallest cellular machines hold the biggest promises.

Microtubules and drug binding

Microtubules with bound drug molecules (SEM image)

For Further Reading

Explore the seminal papers by Borisy & Taylor (1967) and Jensen et al. (2011), or visit the NIH's 3D tubulin database.

References